On May 27th, 2025, Americans for Tax Reform led a coalition of 22 center-right groups in a letter to members of Congress opposing price controls on credit cards.
Specifically, the coalition objected to a pair of amendments offered by Senators Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. The GENIUS Act would establish a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies pegged to another asset like U.S. Dollar or gold, which would enable banks to issue dollar-backed or gold-backed digital currencies. This will smooth frictions in online commerce and squeeze a central bank digital currency out of the market if the Federal Reserve ever tries to create one.
Not content to support good stablecoin legislation that would promote online commerce, Senators Marshall and Hawley introduced amendments to insert their bills regulating prices for credit cards. The Marshall amendment would add his infamous bill with Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Credit Card Competition Act (CCCA), and the Hawley amendment would add his bill with Bernie Sanders (Socialist-Vt.) capping interest rates nationwide.
The letter warns that the Credit Card Competition Act is a danger to small businesses and should be kept out of the GENIUS Act:
The GENIUS Act aims to statutorily codify the rules of the road for payment stablecoin issuers in the United States. The bill provides guidelines for federal and state regulation of payment stablecoins, including transparency requirements, rules to combat money laundering, and safeguards to ensure stable reserves. It would enable banks to issue their own stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar, facilitating frictionless digital commerce. However, any attempt to insert provisions of the Durbin-Marshall Credit Card Competition Act into this bill would turn it into a Trojan Horse for credit card price controls.
The coalition letter goes on highlight that passage of the CCCA would pose significant threat to small financial institutions.
According to a recent study, the CCCA “would significantly reduce revenue for community banks and credit unions and – concomitantly – reduce access to credit in smaller markets across the United States, disproportionately affecting low-income households.” Including the CCCA in the GENIUS Act would contravene its purported goal, which is to increase access to financial services.
The Credit Card Competition Act would threaten rewards programs and network security and would amount to government price-fixing that would disrupt preexisting commercial contracts between card networks, banks and merchants, and would ultimately disadvantage smaller merchants over big box stores with the market power to negotiate favorable terms with card networks that small businesses lack.
Similarly, the Sanders-Hawley price control regime ignores the established consensus among economists that price controls create shortages and do not help low-income consumers:
Prior to 1980, the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Q imposed interest rate caps on bank deposit accounts. Regulation Q was gradually phased out between 1980 and 1986. According to a document published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, “Congress concluded that interest rate ceilings created problems for depository institutions, discriminated against small savers, and did not increase the supply of residential mortgage credit.” The letter concludes: To ensure successful stablecoin legislation and prevent harmful credit card price controls, we urge you to vote against the inclusion of any provisions of the Durbin-Marshall credit card price control bill in the amended GENIUS Act.
Read the full letter here or below.
May 27, 2025
Dear Senator:
We, the undersigned organizations, oppose efforts to impose price controls on credit cards. The inaccurately namedCredit Card Competition Act has been filed as an amendment to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act (S. 1582) – if included it would turn the GENIUS Act into a Trojan Horse for credit card price controls. A separate amendment would use what should be a stablecoin bill to impose nationwide caps on credit card interest rates. Any distortive price controls on credit cards would be poison pills for the GENIUS Act that should be kept out.
The GENIUS Act aims to statutorily codify the rules of the road for payment stablecoin issuers in the United States. The bill provides guidelines for federal and state regulation of payment stablecoins, including transparency requirements, rules to combat money laundering, and safeguards to ensure stable reserves. It would enable banks to issue their own stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar, facilitating frictionless digital commerce.
However, any attempt to insert provisions of the Durbin-Marshall Credit Card Competition Act into this bill would turn it into a Trojan Horse for credit card price controls.
The CCCA would also harm small financial institutions. According to a recent study, the CCCA “would significantly reduce revenue for community banks and credit unions and – concomitantly – reduce access to credit in smaller markets across the United States, disproportionately affecting low-income households.” Including the CCCA in the GENIUS Act would contravene its purported goal, which is to increase access to financial services.
The Credit Card Competition Act remains a bad idea that would threaten rewards programs and network security. It would amount to government price-fixing that disrupts preexisting commercial contracts between card networks, banks, and merchants, and it would ultimately disadvantage smaller merchants over big box stores with the market power to negotiate favorable terms with card networks that mom-and-pop stores lack.
Senator Hawley has also filed an amendment to impose price controls on credit cards, which will only make it harder for working Americans to access credit. Congress already recognized that rate caps are distortive. Prior to 1980, the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Q imposed interest rate caps on bank deposit accounts. Regulation Q was gradually phased out between 1980 and 1986. According to a document published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, “Congress concluded that interest rate ceilings created problems for depository institutions, discriminated against small savers, and did not increase the supply of residential mortgage credit.”
Credit card price controls are not germane to the GENIUS Act would undermine its goals by empowering the Federal Reserve to indefinitely control credit card interchange fees and creating an artificial shortage of credit.
To ensure successful stablecoin legislation and prevent harmful credit card price controls, we urge you to vote against the inclusion of any provisions of the Durbin-Marshall credit card price control bill in the amended GENIUS Act.
Sincerely,
Grover Norquist Steve Pociask
President Chief Executive Officer
Americans for Tax Reform American Consumer Institute
James Erwin Phil Kerpen
Interim Director President
Shareholder Advocacy Forum American Commitment
Daniel Erspamer Karen Kerrigan
Chief Executive Officer Policy President & CEO
Pelican Institute for Public Policy. Small Business & Entrepreneurship
Council
Brent Gardner Brandon Arnold
Chief Government Affairs Officer President
Americans for Prosperity National Taxpayers Union
Yaël Ossowski Lisa B. Nelson
Deputy Director Chief Executive Officer
Consumer Choice Center ALEC Action
Tom Schatz John Berlau
President Director of Finance Policy
Council for Citizens Against Government Competitive Enterprise Institute
Waste
David Williams Paul Gessing
President President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance Rio Grande Foundation
Caroline Melear Lorenzo Montanari
Resident Fellow Executive Director
R Street Institute Property Rights Alliance
Ryan Ellis Gerard Scimeca
President Chairman
Center for a Free Economy Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
David Guenthner Chris Cargill
Vice President of Government Affairs President
Mackinac Center for Public Policy Mountain States Policy Center
Stefan J. Padfield James R. Copland*
Executive Director Senior Fellow and Director
Free Enterprise Project Legal Policy
National Center for Public Policy Research Manhattan Institute
*Indicates Individual Signer