- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Updated: How Much Does It Cost To Hire a New Federal Employee?
From Ryan Ellis on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:48 PMWhen politicians claim that they will save money by “in-sourcing” federal functions from contractors, or will respond to some new need by expanding the federal workforce, that has a cost to taxpayers. How much is that cost?
In order to determine the cost of hiring a new federal bureaucrat, ATR has calculated the “all-in” cost of hiring a new employee. We include salary as well as benefits, pension contributions, and payroll taxes. We assume a 40-year federal career. The numbers presented are both nominal and inflation-adjusted. A COLA is assumed which is equal to the average level in the Washington, DC area for the past five years.
Here are the results for a low-cost, medium-cost, and high-cost employee:
| Low Cost (GS-7) | Intermediate Cost (GS-11) | High Cost (GS-15) | |
| Nominal | $4.73 million | $7 million | $13.86 million |
|
Inflation-Adjusted |
$2.73 million | $4.04 million | $8 million |
- The federal general pay schedule for the Washington, DC area is used
- There are separate estimates for low-cost (GS-7), intermediate-cost (GS-11) and high-cost (GS-15) employees. This was recommended as appropriate levels by former administration officials to give a sense of scope
- The employee is assigned a “Step 5” in the GS table for a 40-year career. As employees move up the GS-scale, their steps bounce up and down.
- The five-year moving average for this locality’s COLA is 3.55%, so that is assumed to be the COLA rate going forward
- In order to account for benefits, pension contributions, and payroll taxes, the GS dollar levels are increased by 33 percent, which was standard budgeting practice in the Department of Labor in the Bush Administration
- The dollar value is expressed in nominal terms and after-inflation (2.5%)
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, SPENDING, LABOR, Federal














Comments
This is only half the equation. To come to any kind of meaningful conclusion, you have to also examine what it would cost to outsource to a contractor. In the Washington, DC, area (as used in your example), I think you'll find the costs to use contractor labor for the same functions would be at least 150% that of using federal employees. Bottom line: While less government is certainly preferable, for those inherently governmental tasks that must be accomplished, using federal employees is generally the more economical approach.
>> Bruce L. Sunday, January 31, 2010 3:33 PM Report Comment