Regrettably, for Americans who see their medical expenses rising, Democrats have taken one obvious cost-cutting measure off the table: medical tort reform. The current malpractice system is one that is terribly inefficient and expensive. There is no limit to how much money patients can sue for and no standard system for dealing with these claims.

 

Doctors combat impending lawsuits in two ways, both of which unnecessarily inflate the cost of healthcare. Most doctors purchase malpractice or asset protection insurance as safeguards against lawsuits. These insurance plans are expensive and raise overhead costs for hospitals. Secondly, doctors are forced to practice defensive medicine. Defensive medicine takes place when doctors order needless tests or procedures to protect themselves against future lawsuits. A 2008 survey found that 83% of Massachusetts doctors practice defensive medicine and that 25% of all imaging tests were ordered for defensive purposes.

 

Medical tort reform drives down insurance premiums by reducing the amount of tests insurance companies cover each year. This would reduce healthcare costs by as much as $200 billion a year. So why are no Democrats talking about eliminating defensive medicine as an easy way to save billions of taxpayer dollars? Trial lawyers, the only opponents to medical tort reform, happen to be in bed with Democrats, consistently raising millions for the Democratic Party. Democrats have sold out the American public for trial lawyers’ “donations.”

 

While Congress recesses, Democrats will try and cook the books on healthcare, looking to make their plans appear deficit neutral. An honest discussion about healthcare reform is not possible until special interests- trial lawyers- are expelled from the conversation. Until then, the status quo and handouts that burden our healthcare system will continue.   

I challenge anyone to explain to me how med mal is a BAD thing. Honestly, the Dems are not putting med mal or any medical trial caps or tort reform in their bill and they think, what, the cost will go DOWN! #Dr.Fail
>> Dr. FeelGood Thursday, August 6, 2009 4:18 PM

Intelligent yet ghetto fab
>> Javier Thursday, August 6, 2009 4:51 PM

Aren't we already paying these costs somehow, either in taxes or in higher insurance prices or lower profit margins for insurance companies and health providers? How else are indigents, like 20-year-old skiers with broken arms and no insurance, or 50-yr-old guys with heart attacks and no health insurance, being accepted at hospitals? If the patients go bankrupt on those costs, who pays for the services?
>> Cal Damage Thursday, August 6, 2009 6:17 PM

Aren't we just changing from unrecognized externalities, like those above and a hundred others, to a recognized (and monetized) cost basis? Isn't putting a metric like 'dollars' on all the costs the first step to dealing with the problem? Shouldn't we prefer knowing explicitly what these costs are, both individually and for the nation, than the fuzzy estimates and the sweeping under the rug of these costs?
>> Cal Damage Thursday, August 6, 2009 6:27 PM

Slimy yet satisfying
>> Francisco Friday, August 7, 2009 8:53 AM