Taxpayer Protection Pledge
ATR's Congressional Ratings
An American Agenda: Vote for Your Priorities
Invite Grover Norquist to Speak at Your School or Event
INDEX

Trains, Pains, and a Whole Lot of Subsidies

From Robert Clemmer on Friday, January 29, 2010 12:39 PM
Add to Reddit Add to Stumbleupon Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

In his State of the Union Address, Obama mentioned that “there's no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.” After his speech he and Joe Biden went to Florida, pitching their idea for high-speed rail. However is this something we really need?
 
While bullet trains offer a new exotic and faster way of traveling, it’s really expensive, so expensive that the private industry has yet to make the idea profitable or viable. Almost $8 billion will be used to fund the new construction of high-speed rails in California, Florida, Illinois, New England, and the Pacific Northwest. However, according to a report by the Cato Institute, this $8 billion is a severe underestimate of the total bill.
 
The Midwest Regional Rail Initiative estimated that upgrading rails to 110 mph standards would cost an average of $3.5 million per mile. The Federal Railroad Administration has plans for 8,500 miles of track, and at $3.5 million per mile the cost would actually be $30 billion.
 
However, the Florida High-Speed Rail Authority has estimated that construction of rail line would cost $27 million per mile. The California High-Speed Authority has estimated that a segment between San Francisco and Anaheim would cost $106 million per mile. These projects are estimated to cost $90 billion, completely bypassing the $8 billion set aside for all high-speed rail projects. It certainly is hard to take Obama’s commitment in the SOTU of “going through the budget, line by line, page by page, to eliminate programs that we can't afford and don't work.”
 
If the projects are going to cost a lot more than $8 billion, why would the government want to start these projects, especially in a time when our country cannot afford to waste money? According to PJ O’Rourke in an interview with Reason ,“politicians love trains. Why? Because they can tell where the tracks go. They know where everybody's going. For politicians it's all about control and power. Politicians hate cars because cars make people free.”
 
One thing to also consider is that these high-speed rails are going to be a Big Boy version of Amtrak, and there isn’t much going for the government run railroad. While Joe Biden may favor Amtrak, Peter Bagge from Reason Magazine would disagree with his take.

 (photo by ajacs)

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: SPENDING, STIMULUS, Federal

Related Articles

Rusty Bowers Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for AZ-01 Race - Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:46 PM

Economic Issues Dominate at the Bloggers Briefing - Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:14 PM

Pushback Against EPA’s Attempts to Regulate Carbon Emissions Grows - Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:59 AM

Will Rep. Baron Hill Hike Taxes on Hill-Rom Workers in Batesville? - Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:07 AM

ATR and CFA Support Earmark Moratorium - Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:26 PM

Add a Comment


CAPTCHA Image
Add me to the ATR Newsletter list (If you are already on the list, you will not be subscribed a second time.)
Notify me when others comment on this article.