- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Social Security Almost Out of Money,
Medicare Already Broke:
Will Tax Increases Be Next?
From Ryan Ellis on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:42 PM
The 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Report was released today, and the message (as usual) is not good.
Here are some quick highlights:
When do these entitlements start paying out more than they bring in? In the case of Social Security, 2016 (only seven years from now). In the case of Medicare, we're already there. Medicare is losing money by the armful.
What happens when the programs start running a deficit? At that point, general fund taxes will start paying for a bigger and bigger share of the benefits. On Medicare, it's already there.
How big is Social Security and Medicare? Social Security is currently 4.4% of GDP, and will hit 6.2% of GDP in 2034. Medicare is currently 3.2% of GDP and will hit 11.4% in 2083. By the end of the window, these two programs alone should equal or exceed total federal spending in a typical year today. That's before counting interest on the national debt, and all of the other functions of government.
How much might taxes go up to "pay for" these programs? According to the report, the Social Security tax would have to rise from 12.4% today to 14.4% permanently. The Medicare payroll tax rate would have to rise from 2.9% today to 6.78% permanently.
That would raise the FICA tax rate from 15.3% today to 21.2% going forward. This rate of tax would be especially harsh on the self-employed, who have to pay both halves of FICA themselves.
What about benefit cuts? Sure, Congress might cut benefits, but that's a stretch. Social Security would return to balance with a 16 percent cut in benefits today. Medicare would be balanced with a whopping 53 percent cut in benefits
Congress might also opt for a lethal combination of tax increases and benefit cuts. The most likely short-term outcome is to float more debt, but that only postpones the decision on how to finance the shortfall.
So are we stuck? That's the good news. The answer is "no." If Congress allowed younger workers the choice to save their Social Security and Medicare taxes in a personal account they own and control, these programs would be pre-funded (as opposed to the current underfunded "pay as you go" tax and spend mechanism). The prefunding would be good forever, benefits would almost certainly be higher, and the programs themselves would not be in such dire straights.
Pro-younger worker solutions like pre-funded personal savings accounts are a far better solution (for the workers and the economy) than tax increases, benefit cuts, or more debt.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, HEALTHCARE, INVESTMENT, BUDGET














Comments
Let's face it. The current Congress is all about spending taxpayer money without regard about benefit to anyone, except maybe themselves to buy votes. They are not even addressing real problems we have in America. God help America if in 2010 we don't as a people achieve a balanced Congress through the elections. Because with the supper-majority the Liberals have today they don't have to worry about their constituency. I write Congressional representatives frequently and rarely get any response and those that I get are "form" letters.
>> L Fraz Friday, May 15, 2009 8:48 AM Report Comment
I love reading these rants about entitlements by the RW, with of course no explanation of how those who are aged or disabled are expected to survive their "solutions" Guess that the unspoken words are that they really don't care if they can or will, huh?
>> D Lang Monday, May 18, 2009 11:16 AM Report Comment
Really. It's all well and good to cut benefits, but oh wait! Not mine! No way.
>> Mik in Montague Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:19 PM Report Comment