Taxpayer Protection Pledge
ATR's Congressional Ratings
An American Agenda: Vote for Your Priorities
Invite Grover Norquist to Speak at Your School or Event
INDEX

Senate Health Bill Breaks
Obama's $250,000 Tax Promise

From Ryan Ellis on Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:11 PM
Add to Reddit Add to Stumbleupon Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

PDF Version

Over and over again, President Obama has promised not to raise “any form” of taxes on families making less than $250,000 per year.  Yet, the U.S. Senate is getting ready to consider a government healthcare bill which does just that.  Here’s how:

Health Insurance Mandate Taxes on Working Families

Individual Mandate Tax (Page 324/Sec. 1501/$8 bil): Starting in 2014, anyone not buying “qualifying” health insurance must pay an income surtax according to the following schedule (capped at 8 percent of income):
 

  Single Single +1 Single +2 <
2014 $95 $190 $285
2015 $350 $700 $1050
2016, etc. $750 $1500 $2250


Exemptions for religious objectors, undocumented immigrants, prisoners, those earning less than the poverty line, members of Indian tribes, and hardship cases (determined by HHS).

Employer Mandate Tax (Page 348/Sec. 1513/$28 bil):  If an employer does not offer health coverage, and at least one employee qualifies for a health tax credit, the employer must pay an additional non-deductible tax of $750 for all full-time employees.  Applies to all employers with 50 or more employees.

If the employer requires a waiting period to enroll in coverage of 30-60 days, there is a $400 tax per employee ($600 if the period is 60 days or longer).

Small business owners pay their taxes on their owners’ personal tax returns.  Since this provision does not exempt business owners making less than $250,000 per year, this employer mandate tax will violate President Obama’s promise in some cases.

Tax Hikes on Healthcare Spending Accounts
   
Medicine Cabinet Tax (Page 1997/Sec. 9003/$5 bil): No longer allowable to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin)

HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike (Page 1998/Sec. 9004/$1.3 bil): Increases additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

FSA Cap (Page 1999/Sec. 9005/$14.6 bil): Imposes cap on FSAs of $2500 (now unlimited).

Tax Hikes on Medical Spending for Those Making Less Than $250,000

Raise “Haircut” for Medical Itemized Deduction from 7.5% to 10% of AGI (Page 2034/Sec. 9013/$15.2 bil): Waived for 65+ taxpayers in 2013-2016 only

Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures (Page 2045/Sec. 9017/$5.8 bil): New 5% excise tax on elective cosmetic surgery to be paid by the surgery patient

If President Obama is serious about his tax pledge, he should immediately renounce the bill.

 

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, HEALTHCARE, OBAMA

Related Articles

ATR Supports H.R. 4781, the
"Keeping American Businesses
Competitive Act of 2010"
- Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:21 PM

Tell Virginia Legislators: No New Taxes in the Budget - Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:00 PM

Economic Issues Dominate at the Bloggers Briefing - Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:14 PM

Pushback Against EPA’s Attempts to Regulate Carbon Emissions Grows - Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:59 AM

Michigan Jobs Ain't What They Used To Be...Unless You Work For The Government - Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:52 PM

Comments

Why would any employer provide health care insurance for employees? This is the first baby step toward socialized medicine which is the ultimate goal. Obama has made the pledge for socialized medicine even if it takes 15 years. We should not be surprised. We should just keep asking WHY.
>> Barb Friday, November 20, 2009 6:49 AM

Add a Comment


CAPTCHA Image
Add me to the ATR Newsletter list (If you are already on the list, you will not be subscribed a second time.)
Notify me when others comment on this article.