INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
The Obama Administration's Favorite Pass Time: Goal Post-Moving
From Sandra Fabry on Monday, June 22, 2009 2:00 PM
The following is cross-posted at www.fiscalaccountability.org:
If goal post-moving was an olympic discipline, the Obama administration would surely be a contender for the gold medal.
We've talked a lot about the administration moving the goal posts when it comes to the "stimulus" package - particularly when it comes to the ill-conceived "jobs created/saved" metric.
Now the administration is moving the goal posts again, this time in the area of transparency.
During the presidential election campaign, President Obama made a lofty promise of posting all bills that reach his desk on the White House website for five days before signing them into law. A few months into the presidency that promise rings hollow after having been broken on multiple occasions. Now, the administration is revising this promise. Writes the New York Times:
Now, in a tacit acknowledgment that the campaign pledge was easier to make than to fulfill, the White House is changing its terms. Instead of starting the five-day clock when Congress passes a bill, administration officials say they intend to start it earlier and post the bills sooner.
So rather than adhering to the initial promise on keeping the bill unsigned for five days after it reaches the President's desk, the White House now wants to provide a link to the legislation "once it is clear that a bill will be coming to the president’s desk. We shall see, but it certainly seems to make it easier on the President to keep that promise."
Now, some question the value of having such a waiting period in the first place, saying legislation is a done deal at that point. However, we agree with the Cato Institute's Jim Harper when he says:
Members of Congress are very skilled political risk analyzers. When the president is enforcing this rule and they know their work is going to sit for five days before signing, they're going to know they can't slip in that last earmark.
The ideal scenario for taxpayers would be both a congressional waiting period for all bills with a fiscal impact (under which the clock would be re-set when a bill is amended) combined with a presidential waiting period as originally promised by President Obama that starts when a bill reaches his desk.
Legislation for a congressional waiting period of 72 hours has been re-introduced by Washington Representative Brian Baird and may actually get more traction this time around in light of the hightened visibility and taxpayer outrage over the way the "stimulus" passed.
Let's hope the momentum keeps groing to the point where we get both a congressional and a presidential waiting period - taxpayers deserve no less after they have been promised an "unprecedented level of transparency."
Photo credit:Clever Cupcakes
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: CONGRESS, SPENDING, OBAMA, TRANSPARENCY, STIMULUS














Add a Comment