INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
DC Launches "Education" Campaign on New Bag Tax
From Patrick GleasonWashington D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty's office sent out a press release today announcing the launch of the “Skip the Bag, Save the River” Education Campaign. The purpose of the campaign is to "educate" DC residents about the 5-cent tax that they will be paying on every plastic and paper bag used to transport purchases from grocery stores and other retailers beginning in January of next year.
This legislation, introduced by DC Councilman Tommy Well (Ward 6), was sold under the auspices of cleaning up the environment, specifically the Anacostia River. Fenty's announced campaign will encourage shoppers to use reusable bags and inform them about where to find them. Both Wells and Fenty either don't see the fault in their own logic, or they think DC residents are pretty dumb.
First, the more reusable bags used, the less money that will go into the new Anacostia River Cleanup and Protection Fund, which the revenues from this onerous new tax are allocated for. Actually, under this new policy, if Washingtonians really wanted to clean up the river they should ask for as many disposable bags as possible at the check out line, thereby ensuring that the river cleanup fund is flush with revenue from the new bag tax. Being the skilled politicians that they are, Fenty and Wells can argue their case with a straight face while knowing deep down that this is nothing more than a grab for more taxpayer dollars under the guise of "being green."
Second, as ATR pointed out in a Washington Times Op-Ed last month, bag taxes, where implemented, have provided no environmental benefit. In fact, Ireland saw a 10% increase in plastic bag usage after their bag levy went into effect.
Lawmakers and taxpayers in Philadelphia, New York City, and elsewhere have seen bag taxes for the farce that they are and have rejected proposals as such. Even the notoriously environmentally-minded Seattle voters resoundingly shot down bag taxes at the ballot just this past August.
Furthermore, as ATR has pointed out before, reusable bags, whose use Fenty and Wells seek to encourage, become easily contaminated when used to transport common household items. Tests conducted by a Miami news station found a reusable bag used to transport meat "covered with bacteria." A bag that had been used to transport produce contained "80 organisms of coli form." Coli form is bacteria found in the feces of warm blooded animals, not exactly something you want your groceries wading in.
If Fenty and Wells want to run a campaign that will actually help DC residents cope with the impending bag tax, they can start by educating them on how not to get sick as a result. After that they can move on to helping DC taxpayers understand the process for recalling dubious legislation passed by the city council and signed by the Mayor.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, DistrictofColumbia














Comments
But once we get sick from the nasty reusable bags, we will have "free" health care magically provided by Obama to make us better. And everything else in DC costs more than other, more civilized, parts of the country already (10% sales tax on FOOD for example) so we might as well pay more for the bags to take our overpriced goods home on the wonderfully inefficient Metro, and then get sick from the food and then have to get government provided health care. So really, I don't see how this plan could possibly go wrong. Another example of the progressive utopia that is Washington, DC.
>> TCH Tuesday, November 17, 2009 3:20 PM Report Comment