- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
ATR Supports H.R. 4781, the
"Keeping American Businesses
Competitive Act of 2010"
From Ryan Ellis on Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:21 PM
Americans for Tax Reform today sent the following letter to Congressman Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.):
On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform, I am pleased to support H.R. 4781, the “Keeping American Businesses Competitive Act of 2010.” I urge all Members of Congress to co-sponsor and support this vital legislation.
Your bill reduces the federal corporate income tax top rate from 35 percent to 22 percent. Importantly, it does so for any tax year ending in 2009, meaning that businesses would be able to benefit immediately from the pro-growth benefits of the tax relief.
Corporations don’t pay taxes—people do. The money which is collected in the form of the corporate income tax first is felt by consumers (higher prices), those with IRAs and 401(k) plans (lesser capital gains and dividends), and employees (lower wages and benefits). A cut in the corporate income tax rate is a price cut at the store, a booster shot to your IRA, and a bonus in your paycheck. A recent study by CBO concluded that $0.60 on the $1.00 of every corporate income tax cut eventually finds its way into higher wages and benefits.
The U.S. imposes the second-highest corporate income tax rate in the developed world (only slightly behind Japan). By reducing the top rate to 22 percent, the U.S. corporate rate (including state corporate income taxes) will be about the same as our European competitors and trade partners, who average a 25 percent rate. This will go a long way toward making America a more attractive place to in-source increasingly-mobile jobs, plant facilities, and corporate headquarters. We’ll need it, since high-growth nations like Ireland (12.5 percent) and the former Warsaw Pact countries have little to no corporate tax at all.
A corporate rate cut has the advantage of solving the deferral of foreign income question in a pro-growth way (since our rate would be the same or lower than many large nations). It reduces the double taxation of retained corporate earnings (capital gains) and distributed corporate earnings (dividends). Corporations who themselves have accumulated capital gains can move assets and not pay a hefty tax penalty. Lower rates encourage the production, rather than the sheltering, of income. A lower rate neutralizes some of the bias toward debt financing vs. equity financing of capital. It makes the gap between tax depreciation and full business expensing less pronounced.
Best of all, H.R. 4781 is a simple, straightforward bill. It merely reduces the top corporate rate. It does not endanger any exclusions, deductions, or credits currently in the code (all of which become less important in a lower tax rate environment). This type of bill should be on the short list for conservative tax reforms in the next decade.














Add a Comment