- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Talking About Cutting Healthcare Costs?
Drug Industry Is Actually Doing It
From Ryan Ellis on Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:24 PM
There's a lot of fast and loose numbers thrown around in Washington these days when it comes to health care. It seems like every other day, President Obama and health industry leaders are pulling some "magic asterisk" out of the air, and claiming to have "cut" real health dollars. When you get past the headline, you find it's more fluff than substance.
Until now.
This week, PhRMA announced that they would be cutting name-brand drug prices in half for many seniors. Under Medicare "Part D," seniors face heavily subsidized drug coverage for the first few thousand dollars in annual drug spending, and when they have a very large prescription drug bill. However, there is a coverage gap in between those two subsidies that many have called the "donut hole." In this "donut hole," seniors are left to pick up the tab for their medicines. It's in this coverage gap that PhRMA is cutting drug prices in half.
Notice what you don't see there. You don't see a government bureaucrat "negotiating" with drug companies. You don't see a price control bill passed by Congress. What you do see is an industry doing well by doing good. They know that happy customers are consistent customers, and there is a perceived customer relations issue with this coverage gap. So, like any group of companies, they are making their customers feel better about buying their product.
Now, suppose the government had stormed in and demanded this. At that point, PhRMA would have to protect the interests of member companies and shareholders, and would need an adversarial stance against the federal "negotiators." Seniors would have ended up with a far worse deal.
There's nothing wrong with our healthcare system that can't be solved by the government just getting out of the way.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: HEALTHCARE














Add a Comment