- Interior Department Hides Data, Pushes Back Offshore Drilling Plan
- It May be Sunshine Week, But There Are Dark Clouds over the Slaughter House (CFA Site »)
- Bill McCollum Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Florida Governor's Race
- Sen. Lincoln (D-Ark.) New Ad: I'm not working for the unions
- Making Laws Should Be Transparent
- CFA in Washington Times: Read the Bill! (CFA Site »)
- How the FCC Plans to Tax the Internet (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Study: Health Care Legislation Will Cost up to 700,000 Jobs by 2019
- Comprehensive List of Tax Hikes in Government Health Bill to be Voted on by House
- Testimony Before U.S. House Appropriations Committee on Labor
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
- The Second Annual Pat Quinn Income Tax Increase Proposal
- How the FCC Plans to Tax the Internet
- Oh, the Irony! It's Sunshine Week, So Let's Push Healthcare Bill Through Without Even Voting On It!? (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
- Wisconsin Gubernatorial Candidate Scott Walker Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Why Do We Get Health Insurance from Our Employers Anyway? (ASA Site »)
- The Enormous Price Tag of Government Run Healthcare (ASA Site »)
- Call for Sunshine Week: "Just Give Us The Earmark Data" (CFA Site »)
- PA-12 Special Election Update: Tim Burns Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- How Government Accounting Works
- ATRF Analysis: The Importance of International Tax Competition
- How Tax Preparation "Simplification" Will Lead to Tax Hikes
- GAO: Implementation of Coburn-Obama Still Lacking in Some Areas (CFA Site »)
Monday, March 15, 2010
- Latest Developments In The Fight To Stop A Govt Internet Takeover
- China Buys Our Debt, We Give Them Renewable Energy Stimulus Jobs...Seems About Right
- ATR Urges Governor McDonnell to Sign Bill to Abolish State Run Tax Filing
- Saving the Sea Turtles...But at What Cost? (PRA Site »)
- Craig Miller Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in FL-24
- The Economics of #StimulusFail
- Missouri Unions and Andy Stern on the Same Page: Raise Taxes (AWF Site »)
- Obamacare, Free Trade, & Our Economic Prosperity
Friday, March 12, 2010
- Rusty Bowers Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for AZ-01 Race
- Ask Your Virginia Legislator to Vote "NO" on Any Budget Containing Higher Taxes
-
ATR Supports H.R. 4781, the
"Keeping American Businesses
Competitive Act of 2010" - Ronald Reagan Legacy Project Urges Naming of California High School After Reagan
- Democrats Attempt to Subvert Congress in Hopes of Carbon Regulation
- Economic Issues Dominate at the Bloggers Briefing
- Pushback Against EPA’s Attempts to Regulate Carbon Emissions Grows
- Minnesota Gubernatorial Candidate Running on a Platform of Tax Hikes
Thursday, March 11, 2010
- Michigan Jobs Ain't What They Used To Be...Unless You Work For The Government
- ATR and CFA Support Earmark Moratorium
- Voter Fraud in the Name of Tax Hikes
- Ballooning Deficits in Greece Foreshadowing Future for the U.S.? (ASA Site »)
- Green Jobs FAIL
- The Evergreen Tax and Fee Spree
- ATR Staffer Testifies Before U.S. House Energy & Commerce Select Committee
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
- The endemic rot in government run health care
- The Debt Panel's 800-lb. Gorilla: Why Andy Stern Stands Out
- The Left Agree: Obamacare Ushers In Their Radical Ideological Agenda
- We Ought Focus On Cutting Taxes & Spending, Not Deficits
- The Debt Panel's 800-lb. Gorilla (AWF Site »)
-
Does the Obamacare Investment Surtax
Apply to Capital Gains? - ATR Urges Opposition to Sen. Isakson Pension Bailout
- Taxpayers to Legislators: Clean Virginia Budget of Taxes
- ATR Supports the Georgia JOBS Act
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
- ATR Urges Utah Governor Herbert to Veto Tax Increase
- More on the VAT
- Public Sector Jobs
- How 550,000 jobs were destroyed by the minimum wage hike
- How Obamacare Will Hurt Poor Women & Children Most
- Federal Workers Make $11,000 More Than Private Sector Workers, and There’s More of Them (AWF Site »)
Monday, March 8, 2010
- Legislation Introduced to Put Ronald Reagan on the $50 Bill
- Pledge Signer Wins Illinois Republican Gubernatorial Primary
- "Net Neutrality" To Kill Jobs
- NY Supreme Court Votes to Evict Residents and Close Businesses (PRA Site »)
- California US Senate Candidates Square Off in First Debate
Friday, March 5, 2010
- ATR and CFA Support the Spending Limit Amendment
- Utah Representative Breaks Tax Pledge
- AWF Will Rate Vote on House Jobs Bill (AWF Site »)
- Energy Tax Hike Series: Use it or Lose it Tax
Thursday, March 4, 2010
- The reliability of spending "estimates"
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Government-Run Healthcare
From Ryan Ellis on Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:42 PM
MYTH: “[My health plan] would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market.”
FACT: The Obama-Reid-Pelosi plan would actually increase health premium costs for the uninsured. The average individual health insurance premium today is $2985 for singles and $6328 for families. According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the average premium will increase to $5800 for singles and $15,200 for families under the Obama plan by 2016. This is 10 to 13 percent higher than they would be under current law. Only those individuals earning less than about $40,000 and families earning less than about $85,000 would receive any tax or spending benefits to even partially-offset this increased cost. Those earning more than this get no help whatsoever.
For small businesses (“small group plans”), today’s average premium is $4155 for singles and $10,956 for families. Under the Obama-Reid-Pelosi plan, this increases to $7800 for singles and $19,200 for families by 2016, a 1-2 percent increase over current law. Only about 12 percent of people receiving coverage from their small business employer would benefit from the small business health tax credit.
MYTH: “[My plan] would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care.”
FACT: Under current law, someone can’t wait until they are sick and then sign up for health insurance. That’s called “gaming the system.” Insurance only works if healthy people are paying premiums each month, so that when you get sick or go to the doctor, money is there for you. If healthy people can wait to buy coverage, the entire insurance model falls apart very quickly. Put simply, “guaranteed issue” would be the death of insurance.
MYTH: “Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan.”
FACT: The Obama-Reid-Pelosi plan taxes your current health insurance, if it’s deemed to be a “Cadillac plan.” It also puts in place minimum coverage requirements in order to remain “qualifying,” which probably will alter your plan. It probably will make it impossible to design health insurance plans which are HSA-compatible. Clearly, you simply can’t keep your current plan under this bill.
MYTH: “According to the Congressional Budget Office – the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress – our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.”
FACT: According to CBO, these cost estimates only pan out if Congress is willing to cut Medicare provider reimbursements, something everyone knows will never happen. Budget savings based on phony, never-going-to-happen spending cuts are bogus. This creates an unfunded liability in the program.
MYTH: “I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, this process left most Americans wondering what's in it for them.”
FACT: When the American people don’t want a massive plan of this size, margins can get a little tight on Capitol Hill. That’s why Obama-Reid-Pelosi had to buy off members with the Louisiana Purchase, the Cornhusker Kickback, the Cadillac Compromise, and untold other backroom, closed-door deals. Back in the campaign, candidate Obama said he would put negotiations on C-SPAN so this could not happen.
MYTH: “There's a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo.”
FACT: One word: money. The American Medical Association, nursing groups, hospitals, and others are receiving billions in taxpayer subsidies under this bill.
MYTH: “If anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know.”
FACT: It’s worth pointing out that even President Obama’s own plan will increase premiums, increase the deficit (at least in the real world) even while raising taxes, cover only some of the uninsured (theoretically), cut Medicare, and drive insurance companies totally out of business. So one might first turn the question back on him.
Can President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and/or Leader Reid use the Internet? Can their staffs? It appears not, since this is a common refrain easily refuted. The fact is, there are dozens of good ideas and several comprehensive plans which have been proposed. The House Republicans have even aggregated all of them. Their list doesn’t include the DeMint plan, nor does it include the comprehensive “American Roadmap” government reform plan (including healthcare) of Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.)













Comments
[i]The Obama-Reid-Pelosi plan would actually increase health premium costs for the uninsured.[/i] Charitably, this lacks precision. The uninsured don't pay premium costs, by definition. They are, after all, uninsured. What ATR seems to mean here are people in non-group policies. According to the CBO, not only do these policies gain considerably in their offerings (compared to current non-group policies that many of us can probably agree are very weak, including large deductibles, out-of-pocket limits and low lifetime caps), but 57% of the people who would be in these plans also receive a subsidy, and the subsidy offers 56-59% off those premiums, on average.
>> Todd Stauffer Friday, January 29, 2010 11:04 AM
Plus, ATR has a bit of an Apples and Oranges problem in the analysis. The apple is $2985 (~$250 per month), which is supposed to be the CURRENT average premium offered to an individual for an individual policy (one of those non-Cadillac plans complete with lifetime caps, coverage gaps and rescission), according to ATR, and the CBO sees premiums for those crappy plans going up about $5500 -- the orange -- under current law (the percentage is mentioned but in passing.) So, $5800 under the proposed reform is 10-12% higher due to the increased benefits and LAW that would require coverage, remove caps and standardize benefits. And 57% of the 17% of the population covered under these plans would received a subsidy.
>> Todd Stauffer Friday, January 29, 2010 11:11 AM
As for the Republican plan and Boehner's claim that it meets the criteria set out by the President in the SOTU address: http://mediamattersaction.org/factcheck/201001280005 http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=2061 What was that about using the Internet, again? :-)
>> Todd Stauffer Friday, January 29, 2010 11:19 AM
Todd: Under the plan, there would be a legal obligation to purchase health insurance. The baseline is comparing what the average premium amount would be in the individual market with and without the "reform." The simple fact is that the "reform" would increase premiums by 10-13 percent over current law in 2016. Secondly, you claim that plans with higher deductibles, higher out of pocket limits, etc. are "bad." I call them "HSA-qualified." I (and all of ATR) have had one of these for several years. HSA plans save 33% in premium costs compared to a traditional plan. This money is then available to save in HSAs. This freedom to choose a rational plan would be denied to me under Obamacare, for separate reasons.
>> Ryan Ellis Friday, January 29, 2010 11:35 AM