INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Nonsensical Argument For A Government Regulated Internet #8367
From Tim AndrewsA lot of nonsensical arguments have been put forward by leftist lobbyists and their allies in their desire for Washington to regulate the internet (to distract attention from Google’s plan to have Congress mandate that consumers subsidize their multi-billion dollar profits).
Perhaps the most stupid argument to date, however, comes from Ken Ward, PhD Candidate, University of Austin(History Department). Mr. Ward has decided that people like Robert Kahn, inventor of TCP/IP and “father” of the internet”, who have denounced government intervention , don’t really know what they’re talking about, so it’s up to him to use his great knowledge and wisdom acquired in his studies (in history) to set the record straight.
Mr. Ward has decided to explain why a recent attempt by Senator McCain to preserve a free an unfettered internet is, in his mind, wrong: National Security. Because he’s really smart. He’s a PhD candidate, you know.
Mr. Ward writes: “I have to point out that McCain's positions is, in fact, a danger to National Security. Let's remember that the Internet grew out of DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which itself grew out of ARPA, the Advanced Research Projects Agency (an Eisenhower baby), both of which were government-funded efforts to ensure that government and military computer networks could survive and maintain in contact in the event of a nuclear or environmental disaster.
The National Security function of what is today known as the Internet has already been largely degraded by the privatization of the Internet backbone, and McCain's bill only further puts at risk National Security by allowing private enterprise to determine the "importance" of Internet packets. As I see it, the best and only way to understand McCain's bill is as a betrayal of National Security interests.”
Never mind the fact that the military applications of the internet were walled off in a separate system years ago, that the military doesn’t need the internet to function, and that this argument makes, well, no sense whatsoever, - he said national security! He must be right! Quick everyone, let the government take over the whole thing – national security! Terrorists! Scary Scary! No time to think! Security is at stake!
On a more serious note, Mr. Ward’s fear of private enterprise, and his complaints about “the privatization of the Internet backbone” reveal the true motive of those behind the push for Net Neutrality: a fully fledged government run and operated internet. With the government dictating what you can and can’t see (already starting in many western countries), what speed your connection is (slow), and what the market will be allowed to invest (nothing).
Mr. Ward might want the internet to return to where it was in the 1980’s, but personally, I quite like having the flexibility, freedom and choice that we have now. A flexible and flourishing internet, free of the cold dead hand of government bureaucracy, is the only way the net shall prosper.
Let’s keep it that way.














Comments
GOVERNMENT IS GREAT AT CONFISCATING MONEY, PROPERTY, AND LIBERTY WITH COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR THE CITIZENRY. GOVERNMENT HAS PROVEN ITSELF UTTERLY WORTHLESS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. IN CASE YOU HAVEN'T NOTICED, IT CAN'T EVEN DECIDE HOW OR IF IT WILL SUPPORT IT'S OWN MILITARY. IT WILL CONTROL THE INTERNET WITH THE SAME FRAUDULENT, DECEITFUL, CORRUPT, AND TREASONOUS INTENT THAT IT CONTINUES TO EXHIBIT IN EVERY OTHER VENUE INTO WHICH IT FORCES IT'S INFLUENCE.(!)
>> DAVE Wednesday, October 28, 2009 5:26 PM Report Comment
Well, actually many countries with government funded broadband programs have much faster internet on average than the United States. Why do think there are so many gamers in Korea?
>> grb Friday, November 13, 2009 1:54 PM Report Comment