Mission Accomplished? Then Can We Get the Rest Back?

From Sandra Fabry on Friday, October 23, 2009 10:36 AM

Yesterday, I posted the following on www.fiscalaccountability.org regarding Obama administration Chief Economist Christina Romer's statement that the "stimulus" had essentially already done its job and will level off next year:

Mission accomplished. Well, that may not be exactly how she phrased it, but in a nutshell, that's what she's saying about the "stimulus," You know, the passage of which was going to prevent the unemployment rate from going up above 8 percent but hasn't.

Christina Romer, the chair of President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, told a Congressional panel today that

spending from the $787 billion economic stimulus has already had its biggest impact on economic growth and will likely not contribute to significant expansion next year.

But, that doesn't matter. Here's why. You may not have realized it with unemployment peaking at 9.8%, but, according to Romer, the package has really been working, and has so far "saved or created" 600,000 to 1.5 million jobs.

Which brings us back to our favorite pet peeve - the fuzzy math of the "saved/created" boondoggle. Sure you can get to these numbers if you do what apparently state agencies are being instructed to do in their reports to the recovery board.

Disregard the distinction between „created‟ and „retained.‟ Simply count all employees paid for with Recovery Act funds.

Since we'll never know what would have happened absent the "stimulus," there is no way to verify or falsify this claim.

But what we do know is that, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics, since the passage of the "stimulus" over 2.6 million people have lost their jobs, and non-farm employment is down in 43 of the 50 states.

Never mind. Mission accomplished, the Administration says. How so? Because they say so.

Russ Roberts raised an important point in his post on Cafe Hayek that I would be remiss not to post:

So if the biggest impact has already happened and the effect is going to level off, can we have the other $593 billion back, please?

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: CONGRESS, SPENDING, OBAMA, STIMULUS, TOLDYOUSO, CFA

Making Laws Should Be Transparent - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 4:30 PM

Study: Health Care Legislation Will Cost up to 700,000 Jobs by 2019 - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:21 AM

Comprehensive List of Tax Hikes in Government Health Bill to be Voted on by House - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:05 AM

How Government Accounting Works - Monday, March 15, 2010 11:59 AM

Craig Miller Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in FL-24 - Friday, March 12, 2010 2:42 PM

Comments

I would take issue with the entire notion that the so-called "stimulus" bill even helped as Dr. Romer claimed in her testimony. The only thing it did was add to already balloning deficit brought on by ridiculous spending programs that the people neither need nor can afford. They should give it back... but they won't, considering all the far-left interests that will end up getting that money somewhere down the line.
>> Ted, FL Friday, October 23, 2009 3:35 PM

According to T. Boone Pickens, we're still spending something like 1/2 MILLION dollars...a MINUTE, on oil. Soooo...with that much money semi-permanently leaving the US economy, what's the final result going to be? If you had a tire that was losing air at a similar rate, wouldn't you be looking for the emergency lane, or a replacement tire, instead of trying to air it back up while you were driving? At this rate, is the government going to be thinking about tent cities? Even if people don't have jobs, or money, they still need somewhere to sleep that'll keep the rain out...
>> Bert Friday, October 23, 2009 7:46 PM

Email this Page
Name
Email Address
Friends' Name
Friends' Email

Enter the Above Characters

Email this Page

Mission Accomplished? Then Can We Get the Rest Back?

Related Articles

Comments

Add a Comment