INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Fact of the Day: Californians Burned by Another Cigarette Tax
From Edward M. Yap on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:13 PM
Every day this week, Americans for Tax Reform will feature a different California tax as part of our CA Budget Tax of the Day series. Today's selection is Senate Bill 600, a 185% tax hike on cigarettes that would cost Californians a whopping $1.2 billion in FY 2010. The following points were included in a press release issued yesterday.
If SB 600 is enacted:
- The state cigarette excise tax will rise by $1.50 per pack - a whopping 185% increase.
- Another $1.2 billion will be confiscated from Californians' pockets during a recession and after the legislature already enacted the largest tax increase in state history earlier this year.
- The effect of SB 600 would be felt predominantly by those least able to afford it. On average, smokers make $36,000 - about 30% less than non-smokers.
- Some rural California counties have a median income of less than $10,000 - pack a day smokers in these counties would see 16.5% of their yearly income go to state and federal taxes
- The statewide average price per pack will rise from $5.38 to $7.28, providing significant incentive for consumers to look for cheaper cigarettes in bordering states, online, and through the sophisticated black market operations that already exist.
To read the rest of the press release, Click Here














Comments
This is just another example of the ridiculous futility of the wide array of "solutions" to budgetary problems that Democrats always come up with: MORE TAXES! Not only that... but they don't even accomplish what the advocates try to argue, they just hit middle-class Anmericans who in times of crisis are the LAST group that needs to be hurting more during Economic harships in the United States.
>> Adam CA Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:21 PM Report Comment
Well California, when you elect progressives, you get progressive policies. If you keep voting for more taxes and a fascist nanny state you will get more taxes and a fascist nanny state. When are people going to wake up and stop looking to the government to give us things and protect us from ourselves? And as California goes, so goes the nation. And Adam, who is the Governor of California? Who gave us the first Stimulus Package and first Bailout? Not a Democrat. We need to stop with the Party nonsense. The Republicans and the Democrats are on the same team. The options are not Republican vs. Democrat they are Liberty vs. Tyranny. The Republicans and Democrats play for team Tyranny and until we realize that they will continue to win.
>> TCH Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:26 PM Report Comment
How about that flat tax now?
>> Johnny from LA Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:08 AM Report Comment
The sad fact of these tax increases is, like the article states, that these taxes hit low income people the most. While democrats "guarantee" they won't raise taxes on low income earners these taxes do exactly that albeit under the table. Low income Americans need to realize that when they elect democrats who argue for enormous new social programs the money has to come from somewhere and it can't be done just by soaking the rich. If anyone wants to see the failures of progressive government in action watch California. Remember social freedom is highly tied to economic freedom, "for a government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take from you everything you have" -Gerald Ford
>> Andy Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:12 AM Report Comment
I'm going to go buy my Reds in Nevada.
>> SJD Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:33 AM Report Comment
Ridiculous. Singling out one particular industry just leads into letting the government slowly taxing everything. Once the government sees that "fast food" is "bad" for you, they'll start taxing it higher to protect you from yourself. Bad, bad, bad. Check out this solution to the CA budget problem. Ridiculous. http://nationalgun.stereopress.com/?p=129
>> Alex Wednesday, June 24, 2009 12:50 PM Report Comment
Just another temporary measure to pay for state overspending.
>> Jeff Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:35 PM Report Comment
Our federal government, as defined by the Constitution, protects no citizen from himself from doing himself harm. Rather the citizens doing harm to one another. Further, the federal government should have no legal responsibilities, regulations or mandatory overseeings of the populace as that is directly and lawfully the full responsibility of the states. Our government has slowly (more rapidly within the last months)invoked a total disregard of our founding fathers plan of a truely capitalistic, liberty and freedom enjoying nation. Cigarettes tax money are a mere pittance in the greed of power felt by the liberals. Keep hold of your "defenses", my friends, that will keep America from falling.
>> Joe Friday, June 26, 2009 8:40 PM Report Comment