|
National Press Releases
[2007] [2006] [2005] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001] [2000]
PRESS RELEASE FROM AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM
Contact: John Kartch (
jkartch@atr.org or 202-785-0266)
Click
here for a copy of this file in Adobe
Acrobat
09/24/02
Chemical
"Security" Bill Spells Homeland Insecurity
Senate's misnamed Chemical Security Act will provide little security,
is opposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, and will empower
environmental groups to harass citizens.
WASHINGTON -
Senator Jon Corzine (D-NJ) is planning to attach to the Homeland Security
bill a provision that gives the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
the power to regulate all chemicals used by corporations or individuals,
including farmers, in the fear that these chemicals could be used against
the citizens in a terrorist attack.
Environmental
groups such as Greenpeace have been lobbying hard to pass S. 1602, The
Chemical Security Act, giving the EPA sweeping new powers to regulate
private use of cleaning agents to common fertilizers. The EPA opposes
the legislation.
"The Chemical
Security Act is a bizarre example of a power grab by special interests
using homeland security as a guise to advance a totally unrelated agenda,"
said taxpayer advocate Grover Norquist, who heads Americans for Tax
Reform (ATR) in Washington. "An agency established to regulate
environmental concerns has nothing to do with protecting Americans from
terrorism. With more power, however, the unforeseen consequences could
be huge."
Corzine's bill
threatens basic property rights by expanding the EPA's power of eminent
domain to seize private property. It would hand the EPA additional power
to regulate American agriculture by giving it power to fine farmers
for their methods of storing fertilizers and pesticides. The bill threatens
America's job base by regulating any company that produces or uses chemicals,
compelling them to take any action deemed "necessary" for
security.
"Public
officials need to draw a line between homeland security and unrelated
riders that give even more power to the federal government," Norquist
continued. "Chemical companies already cooperate with the Pentagon
and FBI on homeland security, and the job of security belongs to security
experts, not a regulatory agency - the EPA doesn't want this power,
nor should it. Security legislation should be judged by its merits,
not a national security scare."
###
Americans for Tax Reform is a non-partisan
coalition of taxpayers and taxpayer groups who oppose any and all federal
and state tax increases. For
more information, or to arrange an interview with Mr. Norquist please contact John Kartch at (202)785-0266 or by email at
jkartch@atr.org.
|