|
National Press Releases
[2007] [2006] [2005] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001] [2000]
PRESS RELEASE FROM AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM
Contact: John Kartch (
jkartch@atr.org or 202-785-0266)
Click
here for a copy of this file in
Adobe Acrobat
09/16/02
A
New Model for Bureaucracy
Why not?
President Bush's proposal for management flexibility in new Homeland
Security Department follows an efficient, business model. So why are
so many of Washington's interest groups against it?
WASHINGTON -
Watching out for America's security is an enormous job, where thousands
of federal workers are scattered across more than 100 different federal
agencies. Yet, as legislation moves through Congress to establish a
new Department of Homeland Security, some seem to want the new department
to run more like HUD than Federal Express.
President Bush
has proposed a Department of Homeland Security with a modern and efficient
personnel system that will provide much-needed flexibility to bureau
and agency administrators. The U.S. House has passed a similar bill,
but it is held up in the Senate due the to the flexibility measures.
Senate Majority
Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), who refuses to budge over the issue, recently
told reporters, "I can't believe he'd veto a bill over the issue
of accountability." But critics of Senate intransigence are praising
that veto threat.
"For the
first time since the creation of the HHS and Education departments out
of the ashes of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare back
in the 70s, Congress can do something positive in the creation of a
new bureaucracy," said taxpayer advocate Grover Norquist, who heads
Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) in Washington. "Jimmy Carter obviously
failed due to his extreme lack of impetus," he continued, "but
to see this thing fail due to a single Senator's intransigence would
mark a colossal failure in future government oversight."
The Senate bill
supported by Daschle does not provide sufficient flexibility to attract,
hire and reward good performers, or to hold poor performers accountable
for their work, which is the most common critique of bureaucracy. The
Senate bill would cement into place a status quo described by the Brookings
Institution as "slow at hiring, interminable at firing, permissive
at promoting, and useless at disciplining."
"For the
first time in decades, Congress actually has the chance to follow through
on all the constant rhetoric about 'changing Washington,'" continued
Norquist, "and to see a handful of Senators squander that opportunity
would be a veritable disgrace."
###
Americans for Tax Reform is a non-partisan
coalition of taxpayers and taxpayer groups who oppose any and all federal
and state tax increases. For
more information, or to arrange an interview with Mr. Norquist please contact John Kartch at (202)785-0266 or by email at
jkartch@atr.org.
|