- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax
From Kelly William Cobb on Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:32 AMOriginally posted at www.StopETaxes.com.
Here we go again! Colorado has officially became the first state this year push a bill to collect taxes on all internet purchases. Yesterday, the House Finance Committee considered "affiliate nexus tax" legislation in a hearing amongst a number of other tax proposals. The measure would require out-of-state online retailers with no physical presence in the state to collect taxes on Colorado residents.
While the bill is a tax increase on consumers and a significant burden on online businesses (and interstate commerce), it also will likely fail to raise revenue. Last year, when the bill passed in Rhode Island, the tax was estimated to raise no additional tax revenue and this has been confirmed by the Department of Revenue. In fact, there was even a bill introduced in Rhode Island this year (House Bill 7071) that would repeal the tax.
Unlike other nexus tax bills, however, Colorado's House Bill 1193 goes one disturbing step further to allow the Department of Revenue to issue subpoenas to any out-of-state business that would require them to provide personal information about their Colorado customers. Who doesn't love sharing their personal information including possibly credit card numbers and purchase details with the government? Presumably, it would allow the state to come after residents to collect "use tax" on the products. Even worse, if a business doesn't provide the information and chooses to protect the proprietary information of their customers, they can be held in contempt. It also would apply regardless of the fact that the same internet tax bill is currently being challenged as unconstitutional in New York.
Similar bills have also been introduced in New Mexico, Virginia, and Mississippi this year. No matter where you live, click here to write your state legislature now and oppose taxes on internet commerce.
Also, click here for a copy of ATR's letter to the Colorado House Finance Committee opposing the eTax.
For more information, visit www.StopETaxes.com or follow us on Twitter (@eTaxes) and Facebook.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, TAKEACTION, eTaxes, Colorado














Comments
Our local, state and federal governments are doing all they can to make it increasingly more difficult for small and medium sized businesses to grow and create new jobs. Well-intentioned? Yes! but evidences show they are horrible politicians who can't see beyond their noses or those of special interests and friends. Citizens, we need to return to the constitution and find men and women of integrity who speak the truth and follow through. Sure it's tough but they are out there. Reward them with bonuses or pay increases when they perform well and remove them from office when they don't. Colorado and all of America is worth saving. It's hard work but didn't our parents and grandparents do that for us? Let's do it now!
>> I W Pulley Saturday, February 20, 2010 1:40 PM Report Comment