- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
California Stealing From Taxpayers. Seriously.
From Tim Andrews on Monday, November 2, 2009 10:47 AMTo try to address the effects of chronic overspending, the state of California has come up with a rather unique proposition: steal from taxpayers. I mean this quite literally. The State of California has decided to steal money from taxpayers to give itself interest free loans.
The Los Angelos Times reports that California will withold an extra 10 percent from the income of its already chronically over-taxed residents: "think of it as a forced, interest-free loan"
The extra withholding may seem like a small amount siphoned from each paycheck, but it adds up to a $1.7-billion fix for California's deficit-riddled books.
From a single taxpayer earning $51,000 a year with no dependents, the state will be grabbing an extra $17.59 each month, according to state tax officials. A married person earning $90,000 with two dependents would receive $24.87 less in monthly pay.
The Times also notes that In February, state income tax rates were bumped up 0.25 of a percentage point for every tax bracket, the dependent credit was slashed by two-thirds, the state sales tax rate rose 1 percentage point and vehicle license fee nearly doubled to 1.15% of a car's value.
This is a flagrant violation of not only sound tax policy, but the rule of law. As Professor of the Department of Economics at George Mason University has pointed out, this is theft.
Suppose your neighbor seizes some of your weekly income while promising to return the funds to you later. Even if he eventually repays you with interest, he’s a thief. Nothing – not his profligacy, not his “need” for more money, not the manner in which he spends the money he filches – excuses his thievery.
It’s fashionable today to accuse private businesses of being greedy, duplicitous, and larcenous. But no business could get away with such audacious seizures of other people’s property – seizures that governments, such as California’s, are escalating to a dreadful new level.














Comments
Califorians live in a dream world and better to tax those idiots than to tax the rest of the US to pay for their naive thinking that has brought them to this ruin. Still they don't wake up. I remember a friend who traveled to California in the late 1970's and called me to say that once she lived their for 60 days, she was entitled to a free college education. Sounded insane but it was true. They have spent themselves into this mess by dreaming about a utopian world that no government can afford unless they have your entire pay check to spend for you. And maybe even then, if wouldn't be enough.
>> Joan Monday, November 2, 2009 12:44 PM Report Comment
Dear Senator hypocrite, Why don't you worry a little more about your own hick constituants and let the good people of California worry about lynching their own state representatives. I am sure you have a goat in someones corn field that needs your attention much worse than we do.
>> Wayne McAdam Wednesday, November 4, 2009 1:45 PM Report Comment
What's good for the goose is good for the gander so how can we devise a method to circumvent the affect o these robbers. It is unconstitutional for the state to take ones property without his or her consent; exxcept possibly with operation of existing law via the legislature. How about increasing the exemptions to offset the theft? Just remember this crime the next time you go to the polls!
>> Bill Wednesday, November 4, 2009 11:56 PM Report Comment
What's good for the goose is good for the gander so how can we devise a method to circumvent the affect o these robbers. It is unconstitutional for the state to take ones property without his or her consent; exxcept possibly with operation of existing law via the legislature. How about increasing the exemptions to offset the theft? Just remember this crime the next time you go to the polls!
>> Bill Thursday, November 5, 2009 12:01 AM Report Comment