INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
ATRF Analysis: Reform Busines Entity Classifiction Rules
From Tim Andrews on Wednesday, November 18, 2009 3:11 PMAmericans For Tax Reform Foundation
Analysis of Administration Proposals to “Reform the U.S. International Tax System”
Analysis of Administration Proposals to “Reform the U.S. International Tax System”
Reform Business Entity Classification Rules For Foreign Entities
Current Law
Businesses are classified under “check the box” regulations. Foreign business with a single owner can choose to be treated either as a corporation, or as a “disregarded entity”. In the case of a disregarded entity, the income of the entity is treated as the income of the owner, and revenue ‘flows through’ the entity to the owner, where it is taxed as income.
Proposed Change
The Obama budget abolishes ‘check the box’ and forces all foreign entities to be treated as corporations.
ATR Analysis
This proposal would completely abolish flow-through. As such, it would lead to significantly higher foreign taxes paid, and an increased burden on investment. It also removes flexibility and choice in corporate structure and financial planning, and denies persons the right to structure their finances as suits their needs.
Furthermore, this proposal may also lead to “double double” taxation: firstly, taxation on dividends paid and again as after tax corporate profits, and then double taxation by the country where a entity is located and also by the U.S. government.
This is a blatant tax-hike disguised in language of reform. If the Administration was serious about reforming international tax law, it would focus on abolishing our complex, burdensome and economically damaging system of ‘worldwide taxation’, and replace it with ‘territorial taxation’ – as is done in almost every other country. The current perverse system forces corporations into such arrangements to remain competitive. Punishing them with such changes will force many to close their doors, leading to lower long term revenue and job loses here at home. It is essential to address the root problem, and not continue with blatant tax grabs such as this.
10-year Revenue Estimate:
U.S Department of Treasury: $86.5 billion
Joint Committee on Taxation: $31.6 billion
Joint Committee on Taxation: $31.6 billion
View as a PDF at http://www.atr.org/userfiles/111809_CheckTheBox.pdf














Add a Comment