- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
ATR Supports "Health Care Freedom Act"
From Ryan Ellis on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:22 PMThe following letter was sent from Grover Norquist to Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) today. The pdf version can be read here:
***
Congratulations on your introduction of the “Health Care Freedom Act” this week. This will likely be the best free-market alternative to government health care offered this Congress, and I would encourage all senators to co-sponsor this excellent legislation.
The Health Care Freedom Act raises taxes on no one, and cuts taxes for millions of Americans. While leaving all current tax relief related to health insurance alone, it creates a new tax credit for individuals to purchase health insurance on their own. Individuals not covered by an employer, government, or other third party health insurance plan could use an advanceable and refundable tax credit of $5000 ($2000 single) to offset health costs. In addition, health savings account (HSA) dollars would be eligible to be used to purchase health insurance premiums.
The Health Care Freedom Act gives all Americans the tools they need to purchase health insurance as empowered consumers with options. Families would be free to purchase health insurance offered in any state, not just the one in which they reside (which they are limited to under current law). States would be block-granted money to create viable insurance options for those with pre-existing conditions. The cost of care will be kept low by putting a hard cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits. Finally, the price of health care services for the first time will be made available to any patient wanting to shop around for the best care.
The Health Care Freedom Act represents a bold new vision of free market health reform. It would ensure 22.5 million Americans who currently lack insurance. Its tax cuts are fully-offset with spending restraint, so it won’t create new government debt.
For the first time, free market conservatives have a bill they can proudly say they are for when fighting against government medicine this year.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: HEALTHCARE














Comments
Great, I can purchase health insurance from any company in the 50 states. Question, can the health insurance companies in those 50 states still turn me down for health insurance coverage because of weight and age? Do I still have to be careful because they will refuse to cover pre-existing conditions? Do I have to get authorization before I can enter an emergency room after an automobile accident or as a result of an heart attack like I do now? Does it reduce any of the premiums, copays, deductibles or limit the annual increases in those amounts? Great bill Senator Demint. Go back and try again. It doesn't fix any of the problems the people have with the current system.
>> Nuhn in Virginia Monday, June 22, 2009 5:12 PM Report Comment
Nuhn in Virginia - Demints bill isn't meant to fix anything. Repugs need a bill to counter Obama so they can claim an alternate plan. But that plan is more of the same failed system where insurance companies reap huge profits while denying claims and refusing to insure people with preexisting conditions - and there are hundreds of them. Demints agenda is not an alternative plan, but rather, PR intended to recapture support for the republican party after stinging defeats and a clear rebuke by voters.
>> Accuracyit Monday, June 22, 2009 8:09 PM Report Comment
This is a good start. People who have made poor lifestyle choices now want those of us who work at health to be their nanny. I suggest that it would be far cheaper for the government to set up a series of hospitals (like the VA has)in each region to take care of those in your predicament. Oh, that wouldn't be good enough for you. What a surprise, but it is good enough for Veteran's.
>> Shaols Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:17 AM Report Comment
At the problem with the current system is that it is statutorily enforced moral hazard. Some of us down here on planet earth would like people to make reasonable cost-benefit decisions about what amount and type of health care is worth it to them. But good luck with your alternative plan for magic, cost-free, unlimited insurance. While you're passing laws, how about one that mandates fire insurance that cover "pre-existing fire damage".
>> Constance Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:30 PM Report Comment
In NJ, healthcare is much more expensive and the choices of policies is less than any other state. NJ is way overregulated. The nanny politicians in NJ dictate to the insurance companies exactly what will be covered and what the minimum deductibles will be. This pushes up the rates for everyone in NJ. If you go to a national insurer and get quotes for different states you will see the huge disparity between states caused by over regulation. This bill will help that.
>> Jay Tuesday, June 23, 2009 6:06 PM Report Comment
This sounds like an American solution. We get the Tarp money back from the banks to help pay for healthcare. The tort reform for lawyers will cut costs because doctors costs will go down as will expensive lawsuits that drive prices up. Being able to buy policies across State lines will dramatically reduce costs by opening up competition. The free market will reduce these problems explained above with exclusions and prices. I also like that we aren't paying for ILLEGAL ALIENS! Their kids are already paid for, their kids school is already paid for,and they are here illegally. The $5K credit is enought to buy a basic policy for a family which includes hospitalizations/emergency/catastrophic coverage and well checks.
>> Tracey Wednesday, June 24, 2009 9:40 AM Report Comment
Finally a common sense plan. Let's not forget 70% of Americans are happy with their healthcare! Out of the 40 million people in America not covered, over 12 million are Illegal immigrants that shouldn't be here--are taking our jobs; overcrowding our schools; not paying taxes since they are illegally here; their kids are already eligible for coverage under existing state programs-- This plan will open competition which will allow capitalism to work and reduce costs. A policy to reduce uninsured catastrophic coverage which drains the econonomy is what we should be considering--not every need being covered. Citizens need to have skin in the game and pay part of their own coverage.
>> Carl Wednesday, June 24, 2009 9:50 AM Report Comment
Nuhn and Accuracyit. Go back and reread. It clearly states yes you can buy insurance from any company in any state. It also says money will be block-granted to states to provide viable options for those with pre-existing conditions. Most of this will be provided with direct tax breaks to the Americans that are in need instead of massive tax hikes to all Americans. The Republicans have been talking about this sort of plan for awhile. Seems like a better,easier first step option to try before Obama ruins our system by undercutting all the contributers. Remember, we have the latest and the greatest treatments here in the US because it's profitable.
>> Amy Wednesday, June 24, 2009 11:12 AM Report Comment
"Republicans have been talking about this sort of plan" Actually it was originally the Libertarians who came up with this plan while the Republicans were busy expanding medicare. Government intervention in health care has expanded more under Bush than any recent Democrat president. Obama intends to ruin the state of health care in the United States. Government healthcare destroys any incentives for developing new cures and treatments.
>> Jay Wednesday, June 24, 2009 12:04 PM Report Comment
Does anyone know where I can read this The Health Care Freedom Act proposal? This is just what might be needed to counter what the libs are trying to ram down America's throat.
>> Ted Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:14 PM Report Comment